Dummy Project
SCREEN-LUNG-80
Screening feasibility, EHR data, and equity follow-up.
Project Story
What readers should notice
SCREEN-LUNG-80 is written as a case a working PM can recognize, not as a sterile protocol summary. The project sits in Screening/Oncology as a Screening study study, but the real teaching point is this: screening studies reveal whether EHR signals, equity, follow-up pathways, site workflow, and patient communication actually support the public-health promise. When readers compare SCREEN-LUNG-80 with their own project, they should look for the same pressure points: what the protocol assumes, what sites can actually do, what vendors must prove, what data must remain credible, what safety or ethics concern could change the plan, and what Daniel Liang's team would ask before accepting a green dashboard as truth.
Lifecycle Coverage
Book Mentions
How to read this case
Look for the moment when ordinary project language stops being enough: a date slips, an assumption fails, a vendor signal loses meaning, or a clinical concern changes the work. Then follow the chapter links, toolkit examples, glossary terms, and packet artifacts to compare this fictional pressure pattern with a real project you manage.